STRUKTUR KURIKULUM DAN PENGEMBANGAN KOMPETENSI NUMERASI: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DI INDONESIA DAN FINLANDIA

Authors

  • Muhammad Ilham Wahyudi Universitas Terbuka https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1109-8883
  • Itun Delima Mira Universitas Terbuka
  • Megawati Megawati Universitas Terbuka
  • Muji Rahayu Universitas Terbuka
  • Nurhasdira Nurhasdira Universitas Terbuka
  • Nurvita Sugiarti Universitas Terbuka
  • Rosa Rachmat Universitas Terbuka
  • Yulina Eva Riany IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v9i1.2561

Keywords:

curriculum structure, numeracy competence, mathematics education, comparative study, systematic literature review

Abstract

Numeracy competence is a fundamental skill that determines students' readiness to meet twenty-first century demands. Persistent cross-national gaps in achievement, most recently documented in PISA 2022, suggest that differences in curriculum design play a substantial role in shaping those disparities. This study examined the relationship between mathematics curriculum structure and the development of numeracy competence through a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Finland. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework was conducted across Google Scholar, Scopus, and SINTA databases using Publish or Perish, producing 15 articles from an initial pool of 130 based on predetermined inclusion criteria and quality appraisal using an instrument adapted from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Thematic analysis suggests that Finland's coherent, conceptually oriented curriculum appears to be associated with the development of students' reasoning and problem-solving abilities, whereas Indonesia's curriculum, which remains comparatively fragmented and procedurally focused, appears to constrain the development of contextual numeracy. The results indicate that curriculum effectiveness in supporting numeracy is determined not merely by written content, but by the extent to which curriculum structure shapes students' overall learning experiences. The implications of this study are relevant to curriculum policy and mathematics curriculum design in Indonesia.

References

Coffey, P., & Sharpe, R. (2023). An investigation into the teaching of numeracy in subjects other than mathematics across the curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(5), 860–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1978570

Foster, C., Francome, T., Hewitt, D., & Shore, C. (2021). Principles for the design of a fully-resourced, coherent, research-informed school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1902569

Haavold, P. O., Storaas Ane, Johnsen, M., Strand, K., & Heimstad, C. (2025). Opportunity to learn in Norwegian and Finnish lower secondary mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 30.

Harzing, A. W. (2016). Publish or Perish. Harzinb.Com. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish

Hemmi, K., Bråting, K., & Lepik, M. (2021). Curricular approaches to algebra in Estonia, Finland and Sweden–a comparative study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1740857

Johnson, P., & Fitzmaurice, O. (2025). Navigating mathematics curriculum reform: teachers’ efforts and implementation challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2495973

Kaitera, S., & Harmoinen, S. (2022). Developing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary school by using visual representations on heuristics. LUMAT, 10(2), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696

Liu, Y., Peng, P., & Yan, X. (2025). Early Numeracy and Mathematics Development: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis on the Predictive Nature of Early Numeracy. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000925

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ratnayake, I. G., Ahl, L. M., Prytz, J., & Jankvist, U. T. (2024). Changing Mathematics Education Practice: a Systematic Review of Mathematics Education Implementation Research in the Nordic Countries. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10021

Remillard, J. T., Condon, L., Koljonen, T., Krzywacki, H., & Sayuj, R. (2026). Teacher agency and the use of mathematics curriculum materials across cultural contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2026.2623283

Soesanto, R. H., & Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2025). Unravelling Affective Mathematical Disposition: Its Role in Strengthening Numeracy Among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(3), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1323-1341

Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., Haverinen, K., Sullanmaa, J., Leskinen, E., & Pietarinen, J. (2022). Building coherence and impact: differences in Finnish school level curriculum making. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00165-9

Song, C. G., & Lee, K. H. (2024). How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? GEM Report UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

World Bank. (2025). Education Finance Watch 2024.

Yang, D. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2024). A comparison of functions in Finnish, Singaporean, and Taiwanese middle-school mathematics textbooks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04081-3

Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2022). Analysis of algebraic problems intended for elementary graders in Finland, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. Educational Studies, 48(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740977

Yuberta, F., & Firmanti, P. (2025). Analyzing Curriculum Change Policies in Indonesia: “A Review on Mathematics Subject.” Wahana Sekolah Dasar, 33(2), 99–114.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Wahyudi, M. I., Mira, I. D., Megawati, M., Rahayu, M., Nurhasdira, N., Sugiarti, N., Rachmat, R., & Riany, Y. E. (2026). STRUKTUR KURIKULUM DAN PENGEMBANGAN KOMPETENSI NUMERASI: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DI INDONESIA DAN FINLANDIA. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v9i1.2561

Issue

Section

Articles