EKSPLORASI STRATEGI KOGNITIF SISWA SMA DALAM BERPIKIR GEOMETRI PADA FUNGSI INVERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v9i1.2550Keywords:
geometric thinking, thinking process, function representation, cognitive strategy, Van Hiele's theoryAbstract
Mathematics learning is expected to develop students' geometric thinking skills and cognitive strategies, but in fact, these skills are still relatively low, especially in the material of functions. This study aims to analyze students' cognitive strategies in solving inverse function problems in terms of the Van Hiele geometric thinking level. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type. The subjects of the study consisted of eleventh grade students selected based on Van Hiele's thinking levels from level 0 to level 3. Data were collected through tests, interviews, and documentation, then analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study show that students' cognitive strategies differ at each Van Hiele thinking level. Students at the low level tend to use simple procedures and are not yet able to explain concepts in depth, while students at the high level are able to use systematic strategies, analyze conceptual relationships, and provide logical reasons for solving inverse function problems. Differences in geometric thinking abilities also affect students' cognitive strategies in solving problems. Therefore, learning is needed that can train students to think gradually so that geometric thinking abilities develop more optimally
References
Alghadari, F., Ma’ruf, A. H., & Yundayani, A. (2024). Students’ inconsistency when solving a geometry problem in three-dimensional context. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v6i2.2510
Alghadari, F., & Noor, N. A. (2020). Students depend on the Pythagorean theorem: Analysis by the three parallel design of abstraction thinking problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012005
Alghadari, F., & Noor, N. A. (2021). Conceptual technique for comparison figures by geometric thinking in analysis level. 2(August), 1–8.
Alghadari, F., Tama, B. J., Sudirman, S., Kusuma, A. P., & Huda, S. A. A. (2022). Completion for a geometric-function problem: Process and resources in efficiency consideration. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i2.10365
Alghadari, F., Yundayani, A., & Genç, M. (2022). Learning Habits Shaping Mathematical Literacy: Lens Through the Chronology of Time and Cognitive Processes. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 5(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v5i1.14
Arikunto, S. (2015). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. 2013.
Christofferson, H. C. (2015). Geometry-a W a y of Thinking. The Educational Forum, 1725(November). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131723809340031
Dr. J. R. Raco, ME., M. S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Grasindo, Jalan Palmerah Selatan 22 - 28, Jakarta 10270.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (2nd ed.).
Fachrudin, A. D., & Juniati, D. (2023). Kinds of Mathematical Thinking Addressed in Geometry Research in School : A Systematic Review Macam-Macam Mathematical Thinking dalam Penelitian Geometri di Sekolah : A Systematic Review. 6(2), 154–165.
Hutajulu, M., Perbowo, K. S., Alghadari, F., Minarti, E. D., & Hidayat, W. (2022). The process of conceptualization in solving geometric-function problems. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p145-162
Liu, Y., He, K., Man, K., & Zhan, P. (2025). Exploring Critical Eye-Tracking Metrics for Identifying Cognitive Strategies in Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: A Data-Driven Perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 13(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020014
Manik, P., Saraswati, S., Ngurah, G., & Agustika, S. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Mata Pelajaran Matematika. 4(2), 257–269.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Montague, M., Krawec, J., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2014). The Effects of Cognitive Strategy Instruction on Math Problem Solving of Middle-School Students of Varying Ability. 106(2), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035176
Nengsih, T. A., Arisha, B., & Safitri, Y. (2022). Statistika Deskriptif dengan Program R. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Noor, N., & Alghadari, F. (2021). Case of actualizing geometry knowledge in abstraction thinking level for constructing a figure. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.797749
Nursiah, F. Y. (2025). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Melalui Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam di SD Negeri 1 KRUENG Buloh Cut. Journal BIOnatural, 12(2), 21–28.
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Paoletti et al. (2024). Exploring and Promoting Students Covariational Reasoning and Developing Graphing Meanings Teo.
Post, M., & Prediger, S. (2024). Teaching practices for connecting multiple representations in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 36(1), 95–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00431-z
Schenck, K. E., & Nathan, M. J. (2024). Navigating Spatial Ability for Mathematics Education : a Review and Roadmap. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 36, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09935-5
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanto, S., & Mahmudi, A. (2021). Tahap berpikir geometri siswa SMP berdasarkan teori Van Hiele ditinjau dari keterampilan geometri. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i1.17044
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2021). Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics: Developmentally Appropriate Instruction for Grades Pre-K–2 (Volume I (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Vigneau, F., Caissie, A. F., & Bors, D. A. (2006). Eye-movement analysis demonstrates strategic influences on intelligence. Intelligence, 34(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.003
Xu, J. (2022). High level cognitive strategies scale for middle school students: A psychometric evaluation. Current Psychology, 41(5), 2711–2718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00786-1
Yu. (2021). Fundamental Elements of the Strategy Concept 3 “. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4713-7
Zentgraf, K., & Prediger, S. (2024). Demands and scaffolds for explaining the connection of multiple representations : Revisiting the bottle-filling task. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73(January), 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101118
