ANALISIS PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN KONSEPTUAL DAN PROSEDURAL PADA MATERI POLA BILANGAN SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v9i1.2448Keywords:
conceptual learning, procedural learning, number patterns, CTLAbstract
This study is motivated by students’ low conceptual and procedural understanding in number pattern material, where students tend to follow procedures without understanding the underlying concepts. This study aims to analyze the implementation of conceptual and procedural learning and to determine the level of students’ understanding in grade V of SDS RK Budi Murni 6 Medan. The study used a mixed methods approach with a descriptive type. The subjects were 28 students selected using purposive sampling and grouped into high, medium, and low categories. Data were collected through observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. Qualitative data were analyzed descriptively to describe students’ thinking processes, while quantitative data were analyzed using percentages. The results showed that 21.43% of students were in the high category, 50% in the medium category, and 28.57% in the low category. High-category students showed balanced conceptual and procedural understanding, medium-category students were more dominant in procedural understanding, and low-category students experienced difficulties in both aspects. Therefore, learning should emphasize a balance between conceptual and procedural understanding to improve students’ learning outcomes
References
Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge And Problem-Solving Skills In Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis And Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Azira, N., Astuti, A., & Wahyuni, M. (2025). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Coopeative Tipe Meaningful Instructional Design (MID) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa SMP. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v8i2.2344
Balkist, P. S., Lukman, H. S., & Andriani, N. (2022). Development Of Social Arithmetic Teaching Materials To Improve Understanding Of Mathematical Concepts Of Junior High School Students. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v5i2.84
Fatimah, & Yuwono. (2023). Klasifikasi Kemampuan Siswa Berdasarkan Pemahaman Konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(2), 45–55.
Junaedi, A. C. S., & Susilo, G. (2025). Judul artikel. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Education Professional (EDUPRO), 2. https://edupro.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/edupro/article/view/70
Hutabarat, K. H., Azzahra, A. R., Fahrunnisa, B. ., Luhukay, M. Z., Azzahra, N. N., & Putri, H. E. (2025). Pemahaman Konseptual Peserta Didik Terhadap Sifat -Sifat Bangun Datar Berdasarkan Teori Van Heile. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v8i1.2261
Kebudayaan, K. P. dan. (2020). Pembelajaran abad 21 dalam pendidikan dasar. Kemendikbud.
Luqmanul Hakim, L., & Yasmadi, B. (2021). Design Engineering Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics Education. 1271–1280.
Mathematics, N. C. of T. of. (2020). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. NCTM.
Mida, A. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 1–10.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2020). Early awareness of mathematical pattern and structure. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 100753.
Novita, R., Putra, M., Usman, & Junita, S. (2025). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in students’ fraction division thinking: Insights from a hermeneutic phenomenological study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(4), 1233–1256. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i4.pp1233-1256
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. OECD Publishing.
Pelayo, E. O., Lomibao, L. S., & Tan, R. G. (2023). Conceptual Understanding vs. Procedural Fluency: A Literature Review on the Mathematics Teachers Emphasis in Teaching of Rational Algebraic Expressions. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-3-1-10
Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2020). Students’ errors in pattern generalization. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 123–136.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2018). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 359–386.
Sari, D. P. (2021). Pembelajaran kontekstual dalam meningkatkan pemahaman matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 89–98.
Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2019). The role of conceptual knowledge in learning mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 1–22.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Syifa, T. N., Lestiana, H. T., & Haqq, A. A. (2025). Realistic mathematics education: strategi inovatif untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual dan motivasi belajar siswa. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v8i2.2341
Uket, & Cukei. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 20–30.
